Lessons Learned: The CI CD Chronicles
Every engineering team has That One Thingâ˘. The thing that nobody really owns. The thing thatâs âon the listâ but somehow never gets prioritized. Ours? The deployment pipeline.
This is the story of how I inherited a janky, half-manual Dev environment deployment process andâarmed with coffee, GitHub Actions, and stubbornnessâdragged it into a glorious, automated future.
Act I: Prototype to Production (a.k.a. âItâs fine. Itâs just Dev.â)¶
Letâs rewind a bit.
When our project first started, we were moving fast. I mean really fast. Blink and weâd already gone from napkin sketches to a functioning prototype. The thing is, we never really stopped to take a breath before jumping headfirst into production.
And because of that, we cut cornersâlike every startup-turned-enterprise-featured team does. One of the biggest corners? Our CI/CD story. We had three Dev environments, each with different capacities, different purposes, and almost zero standardization.
Deployments were... manual. And I donât mean âclick a buttonâ manual. I mean:
- Check out the right branch
- Update a values file
- Run
helm upgrade
- Whisper a prayer to the kube gods
- Hope the right service restarted
This sacred ritual had to be performed by a team member who happened to have time, remembered how it worked, and wasnât actively chasing down a production fire. Which meantâŚ
Act II: Merged â Deployed¶
As a developer, there is no feeling more demoralizing than fixing a bug, merging it to main
, closing the story... and then hearing two days later:
âHey, that bug's still happening. Are you sure itâs fixed?â
And youâre sitting there like:
âUh, it worked on my machine? đ â
Thatâs when it hit me. We had no guarantee that what was in main
was actually running anywhere. Merges werenât triggering deploys. The only way to know if something had been deployed was to... ask around? Check Slack messages? Consult tea leaves?
So I decided to fix it. Not just patch it. Overhaul it.
Act III: CI/CD Redemption Arc¶
After confirming with my tech lead (and receiving his official Blessingâ˘), I went full monk mode on our GitHub Actions workflows.
đ Reusable Workflows¶
I started by refactoring everything into reusable workflows. If I was going to maintain this across multiple repositories later, I didnât want to copy-paste 400 lines of YAML like some kind of barbarian.
Each job had a purpose. Each script was isolated. Each output was clean. Future-me would thank me. (Spoiler: he did.)
đ Autodeploy for Main¶
Then I added what we shouldâve had from Day 1: automatic deployments to a default Dev environment from main
. No more waiting for someone to âget around to it.â
If the build passed, it deployed. Period.
đ§Ş Manual Deploy for Branches¶
To keep the flexibility, I also wired in a workflow_dispatch dropdown, so developers could deploy their own branches to any of the three Dev environments on demand. Suddenly, testing something specific didnât require interrupting whoever held the tribal Helm knowledge.
đŁ Slack Integration (a.k.a. The Whistles and Bells)¶
And because I believe every good automation deserves a voice, I integrated our pipeline with Slack.
- â Success? The team hears about it.
- â Failure? The team definitely hears about it.
At first, people were skeptical. âDo we really need another Slack channel?â Now? That channel is where we live. It's our early warning system, our QA buddy, and our deployment historian. We've caught broken tests within minutesânot days.
Act IV: The Payoff¶
The impact was immediate and dramatic.
- Developers could test their work independently without waiting in line.
- QA had clear visibility into what was running where.
- We could ship hotfixes in hours, not days.
- Bugs that used to linger undetected until the next manual deployment were now caught and fixed in near real-time.
Most importantly, the development process became predictable.
It didnât just feel goodâit felt right. And for the first time in months, I could merge a PR and trust that it would land somewhere meaningful. Not just in a Git log, but in a running service.
Final Thoughts: Build It Right, or Build It Twice¶
If thereâs a lesson here, itâs this: donât let the CI/CD stuff become That One Thingâ˘. It may not be glamorous. It may not be top priority. But when you fix itâreally fix itâit pays dividends across every part of your teamâs workflow.
And hey, if you ever need to explain why itâs worth investing time into automating deployments, feel free to steal my favorite line:
âBecause one day, youâll want to actually test the thing you just builtâand your future self will love you for making that easy.â